Markets
Opinion
Weather
Irrigation
New Products
Employment
Livestock
Rental Units
Real Estate
Search All
Submit Classified
Regional Sales
Farm Auctions
Crops
Dairy
Current Markets
Equestrian
Gardening
Recipes
Editorial Calendar
Staff
Subscriptions
Work Here
Print Edition
Weekly E-Edition
Market Watch Online email
Producer Progress email
Livestock Auctions email




Columbia trade deal bad for cattlemen, U.S.


Friday, April 11, 2008 3:31 PM CDT

  


The Colombia FTA would limit inspections and safety requirements for food imported into the U.S. from Colombia, incluing an ”equivalence determinations” that require the U.S. to permit imports of meat and poultry products that do not meet U.S. safety standards.

Once the so-called “equivalence” is achieved, Colombian food products imported into the U.S. must only meet the standards of the exporting country n not those of the importing country.

The Colombia FTA is, essentially, an extension of the North American Free Trade Agreement because it continues to treat cattle and beef as if they were storable industrial goods, rather than perishable and cyclical products.

The ITC (International Trade Commission) and Congress predicted NAFTA likely would have no impact on the U.S. cattle industry because duties, at that time, were already considered small. However, the trade surplus the U.S. had in beef trade between Mexico and Canada soon evaporated. By 2005, the deficit had reached $613 million.

Another concern is that the U.S. is expected to export to Colombia primarily high-quality beef products, while Colombia will be able to send us beef in which we have no idea what production standards were used.

The U.S. inspects only about 11 percent of imported beef, pork and poultry, and we certainly don’t have the resources to ensure that Colombia is not using veterinary drugs, pesticides and feed supplements that are banned here in the United States.

  

Additionally, the Colombia FTA’s rule of origin does not require beef to be derived from cattle born, raised and slaughtered in Colombia.

That means live cattle from surrounding South American countries can be exported to Colombia, slaughtered in Colombia, and the resulting beef would qualify to be exported to the United States. The U.S. has the highest production standards in the world, and we should be using trade agreements to help elevate the production standards in foreign countries, not lowering our standards simply to facilitate more beef imports into the U.S.

The Colombia FTA will result not only in an increased food safety risk, but also economic harm to U.S. cattle farmers and ranchers.
  

Eric Nelson is R-CALF USA Region VII director and cochairman of the group’s trade committee

 

Comments »

Juan C Racines wrote on May 31, 2008 4:57 PM:

" How in the world do you believe this, I was born and raised in Colombia you spell that with O COLOMBIA, our beef is so totally superior in tate the cows are feed with better grass yes better even an egg tates better there, because the feed is natural, you are confusing us with Mexico, I try once eating beef liver here in the U.S. and almost threw up, your inspections have also been in the news when people get sick your problem is that you have to
blame others for your own misfortune. "

Chas Puckett wrote on May 11, 2008 10:53 AM:

" The main question here is who is the government rep. that is entrusted to make these trade deals?
The USA would consider accepting deal that treated animal products as storable industrial goods? If so, there is no hope for a reasonable deal without replacing the US negotiators!
Obviously, we need meat & poultry that meet our production and inspection standards. Still better, if we can't make a deal that will meets or exceeds safety standards that covers production, shipping and final inspection, the American citizen will be safer consuming our meat products! "


Comment on this story

Comments will be approved within 48 hours

(optional)
   





Copyright © 2010 Ag Weekly | Terms of Use/Privacy Policy