| ||||||
White House defends NAFTA: ‘There’s nothing broken’
WASHINGTON - The White House on Friday vigorously defended the 14-year-old free-trade agreement among the United States, Mexico and Canada against sharp criticism from Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.
“There’s nothing broken. Why fix it?” said Dan Fisk, senior director of Western hemisphere affairs for National Security Council. He acknowledged the administration must do a better job of explaining the benefits of the agreement.
Both Clinton and Obama have threatened to pull out of the North American Free Trade Agreement to pressure Canada and Mexico to negotiate more protections for workers and the environment in the agreement. The accord has removed most barriers to trade and investment among the three countries.
NAFTA will be a major topic when President Bush joins Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexican President Felipe Calderon in New Orleans on Monday and Tuesday for his fourth and final North American Leaders’ Summit.
Bush has suffered a major setback on the trade front with the derailing of a proposed free-trade pact with Colombia. Bush sent the agreement to Capitol Hill earlier this month, but the House, led by Democrats, decided to eliminate a rule forcing a vote on the deal within 60 legislative days. The House’s decision probably kills consideration of the agreement this year, leaving it for the next administration.
“Leaders in Congress have made a serious error,” Bush said in a speech. “A serious error for economics reasons. A serious error for security reasons. It’s not too late, however, for them to get it right.”
On NAFTA, the White House contends the agreement has been a boon for the economies of all three countries. Three-way trade has swelled from roughly $290 billion in 1994 to about $1 trillion by the end of this year, Fisk said at a briefing on next week’s summit.
“We think NAFTA works,” he said. Fisk said the criticism from the campaign trail has gotten a lot of attention from U.S. trading partners. “Some of the statements that have been made here have made bigger headlines in Canada and Mexico than they have here,” he said.
“We want to find ways to, frankly, convince the American people from our perspective first and foremost that this is an arrangement that has worked for us and it’s also worked for our neighbors,” he said. “It’s been a win-win situation.”
Comments »
Comment on this story
Comments will be approved within 48 hours
Crop subsidies switched to feeding needy as food prices rise
Siphoning Off Corn to Fuel Our Cars
House votes on requiring combustible dust rule changes
Bush says farm bill would not help with rising food prices
Union and states try recruiting farm workers from Mexico
UI awards honor students, faculty, staff
Chocolate Colossus Mars Is Buying Gum Goliath Wrigley
Global Food Crisis: A Return to Wheat?
New S. Idaho hydropower plant online
Negotiators reach tentative farm bill deal
Water board completes purchase of Pristine Springs fish farm
U.S. judge sends Nevada canal water flow case to state court
Changing Economic Conditions Destabilize World Food Supply
Protection weighed for bird in West’s energy areas
Negotiators reach tentative farm bill deal
Ag leaders urge more regulation of railroad monopoly
Canola fuel trademark rarely seen as US sales flounder
June Ag Tour heads for Hells Canyon
Alice Thomas wrote on Apr 19, 2008 2:00 PM:
Alice Thomas "