Ag Weekly Online: Twin Falls, Idaho

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (BUSINESS WIRE) - An ambitious and well-meaning attempt to make California’s dairy products safer arrives this week in the California Assembly in the form of State Bill 201 - but the country’s top food safety advocates are calling on California legislators to vote against it. The bill places regulations on producers of raw milk dairy products and lays groundwork intended to stem the tide of deadly food borne illnesses tied to the raw milk industry. It sounds good, and may have enough support to reach the Governor’s desk, where the same advocates encourage a veto. What’s the problem?

"It’s difficult to work so hard against a bill that has such good intentions," said William Marler, food safety advocate and attorney. "But SB 201 actually creates a detour around the regulation of raw milk, and must be re-written before the bill is ready. There are children on life support because of raw milk tainted with E. coli and other toxic bacteria, and there will be more of them in California - and nationwide - unless changes are made to this legislation."

Rather than detailing the levels of fecal contaminates acceptable in a regulated raw milk product, the bill proposes that raw milk be regulated by a HACCP protocol. HACCP - Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point - is a food safety and self-inspection system that describes procedures for producing potentially dangerous foods. There are national HACCP protocols in place for juice, meat, poultry, and seafood processing, but none for raw milk. Developing a HACCP protocol can take years, and if SB 201 is signed as written, California raw milk will enter a black hole of regulation. Companies will be free to produce raw milk essentially unregulated until a HACCP plan is ready.

"Raw milk-given that it is outside the pasteurization process - has inherent risks," continued Marler. "Illnesses from raw milk and raw colostrum - E. coli, Campylobacter, and listeria - are on the rise, and we’ve seen first-hand a growing number of consumers whose lives will never be the same because of this product:

-Dee Creek Farm E. Coli O157:H7 11 ill, 4 with Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome, or HUS

-Grace Harbor Farms E. Coli O157:H7 2 children ill, one with HUS

-Organic Pastures E. Coli O157:H7 6 ill, 2 children with HUS

-Herb Depot E. Coli O157:H7 Two children ill

-Town Farm Dairy E. Coli O157:H7 5 ill, 2 with HUS

-Alexandre Family EcoDairy Farms Campylobacter 15 illnesses, one on a ventilator."

Raw milk is at the center of a nationwide controversy over its potential value as a nutritional food versus the severe illnesses that can result from contaminated product. Pasteurization was developed to rid dairy products of pathogens like toxic E. coli as well as to assure a longer, safer shelf life. Proponents of raw milk believe that pasteurization also eliminates healthful benefits of the dairy product. (Peer-reviewed literature on the raw milk controversy can be found by clicking here for pro and here for con.)

"It’s the large producers of raw milk products that SB 201 aims to regulate," said Marler. "Because of the HACCP loophole, a huge amount of contaminated product could reach the public. This bill is intended to stop them, but instead will give them a free ride for years to come. California Legislators and Governor Schwarzenegger, please send SB 201 back!"

BACKGROUND: An accomplished personal injury lawyer and national expert in foodborne illness litigation, William Marler and his partners at Marler Clark have represented thousands of individuals in claims against food companies whose contaminated products have caused serious injury and death. His advocacy for better food regulation has led to invitations to address local, national, and international gatherings on food safety, including recent testimony to US Congress Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Comments »

Sylvia wrote on Aug 24, 2008 7:43 PM:

" Pasteurization, a process discovered by Louis Pasteur while trying to inactivate spoilage organisms in beer and wine; It was NOT "developed to rid dairy products of pathogens". At the time of its discovery,dairy was not in any of Pasteur's notes. Get your facts straight.

http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/history/biographies/louis_pasteur.htm

Heres something we found online that was drawn up for a Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors concerning outbreaks from pasteurized milk:

1997, 28 persons ill from Salmonella in California, ALL FROM PASTEURIZED MILK.

1996, 46 persons ill from Campylobacter and Salmonella in California.

1994, 105 persons ill from E. coli and Listeria in California

March of 1985 19,660 confirmed cases of Salmonella typhimurium illness FROM CONSUMING PROPERLY PASTEURIZED MILK. Over 200,000 people ill from Salmonella typhimurium in PASTEURIZED MILK

1985, 142 cases and 47 deaths traced to PASTEURIZED Mexican-style cheese contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. Listeria monocytogenes SURVIVES PASTEURIZATION!

1985, 1500 persons ill from Salmonella infection

August of 1984 approximately 200 persons became ill with a Salmonella typhimurium from CONSUMING PASTEURIZED MILK

November of 1984, another outbreak of Salmonella typhimurium illness from CONSUMING PASTEURIZED MILK

1983, over 49 persons with Listeria illness have been associated with the consumption of PASTEURIZED MILK in Massachusetts.

1993, 28 persons ill from Salmonella infection

1982, 172 persons ill (100 hospitalized) from a three Southern state area from PASTEURIZED MILK.

1982, over 17,000 persons became ill with Yersinia enterocolitica from PASTEURIZED MILK bottled in Memphis, Tennessee. "

Comment on this story

Comments will be approved within 48 hours