AG Weekly Online -- Twin Falls, Idaho
Markets
Opinion
Local News
Weather
Irrigation
New Products
Employment
Livestock
Rental Units
Real Estate
Search All
Submit Classified
Regional Sales
Farm Auctions
Crops
Dairy
Current Markets
Equestrian
Gardening
Recipes
Editorial Calendar
Staff
Subscriptions
Work Here
Print Edition
Weekly E-Edition
Market Watch Online email
Producer Progress email
Livestock Auctions email
2008 in Review
2009 Irrigation Show
Recipes
MarketWatchOnline
Cowboy Humor
Entertainment
Current Markets



Search News:

Advanced Search»

Search Ads

Get more Ag News and search more ads on these Lee Agri-Media sites:

Lee Agri-Media

Minnesota Farm
   Guide

Farm&Ranch
   Guide

Tri-State
   Neighbor

AgAds.com

The Prairie Star

Midwest
   Messenger

Agri-View

Livestock
   Roundup

Midwest
   Marketer

Ag Weekly

Midwest Producer

Bullseye North

FarmEquipment
   Center.com

Iowa Farmer
   Today

Missouri Farmer
   Today

Cattle Seller




Ag News  

FDA to review genetically engineered farm animals


Thursday, September 18, 2008 1:37 PM CDT

  
  

WASHINGTON - Super Chicken strutted a step closer to the dinner table Thursday. The government said it will start considering proposals to sell genetically engineered animals as food, a move that could lead to faster growing fish, cattle that can resist mad cow disease, or perhaps heart-healthier eggs laid by a new breed of chicken.

The Food and Drug Administration issued a proposed legal framework for how it would resolve such questions as whether the altered animals are safe for human consumption and pose no serious environmental risks. FDA officials said they are focusing on animals that will be used as food, or to produce medications that would then be consumed by people or other animals. The agency is not interested in reviewing genetically engineered mice already widely used in lab experiments.

"Genetic engineering of animals is here and has been here for some time, " said Larisa Rudenko, a science policy adviser with the FDA's veterinary medicine center. "We intend to provide a rigorous, risk-based regulatory path for developers to follow to help ensure public health and the health of animals."

Reaction from consumer groups was mixed. On one hand, they welcomed the government's decision to regulate genetically altered animals. But they cautioned that many crucial details remain to be spelled out. For example, the FDA does not plan to require in all cases that genetically engineered meat, poultry and fish be labeled as such for consumers.

"They are talking about pigs that are going to have mouse genes in them, and this is not going to be labeled?" said Jean Halloran, director of food policy for Consumers Union. "We are close to speechless on this."

Nonetheless, Gregory Jaffe, who heads the biotechnology project at the Center for Science in the Public Interest called the FDA action a "good first step."
  

"This is the first time the federal government is announcing a comprehensive regulatory system that addresses the concerns from these animals," said Jaffe. "But it may not have addressed all the environmental concerns."

Genetically engineered animals are not clones, which the FDA has already said are safe to eat. While clones are exact copies of an animal, genetically engineered animals are manipulated by scientists to bring about a change in their characteristics. In years past, this was done by breeding animals with desirable traits. But now the changes can be made directly in the lab.

Genetically engineered animals are created when scientists insert a gene from one species of animal into the DNA of another animal to reprogam some of its characteristics. For example, fish could be made to grow faster, or pigs might be re-engineered to produce less waste. Animals can also be engineered to produce substances in their milk and blood that can later be used for human drugs.

Genetic engineering is already widely used in agriculture to produce higher-yielding or disease-resistant crops. But it's unclear how consumers will react to altered animals, even if they come with a government seal of approval.

On the net:

FDA: http://tinyurl.com/4pv795

A service of the Associated Press(AP)

 

  

Comments »

Michael Gabriel wrote on Sep 29, 2008 3:33 PM:

" Wht is Bonnie Nielsen making such a stink about this? Why is it that she automatically assumes that genetically altered animals are going to be a health risk? People eat mice with no adverse effectsm right? People eat there wheight in ribs and bacon, correct? So why is a pig, one that is environmentally a whole lot safer, going to be such a treacherous health foe?

Like it says, people have been selective breeding animals for a long time, maybe its time we speed up the process and get close to super-naruarally good results???? "

BONNIE NIELSEN wrote on Sep 21, 2008 9:01 PM:

" WHY AREN'T THE PEOPLE HAVING A SAY IN THIS CLONED FOOD AND GENETISLY ENGINEERED FOOD. WHAT WE HAVE TO WAIT TEN YEARS AND FIND OUT THAT IT IS GOING TO KILL US IN THE END OR CAUSE MORE KINDS OF CANCERS THAT THERE IS NO CURE FOR LIKE NOW. WHERE IS YOUR RESPONSIBLITY TO THE HEALTH OF THE PEOPLE??????????????????????????? "


Comment on this story

Comments will be approved within 48 hours

(optional)
   

Print this story

Email this story

Search Archives

More News in News > Ag News



Copyright © 2009 AG Weekly Online | All Rights Reserved | Terms of Use/Privacy Policy | Advertisers